Alles over het Visa Dispute Monitoring Program (VDMP) en hoe je het VDMP kunt vermijden

Historical VDMP reference: Visa consolidated legacy dispute/fraud monitoring into VAMP beginning April 1, 2025 in applicable markets. Visa's VAMP fact sheet describes the current program and regional/acquirer conditions. The VDMP mechanics and figures below concern the former program; do not use them to determine present enrollment or fees. For current operations, see Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP).

Visa Dispute Monitoring Program (VDMP for short) was how Visa scrutinized merchants to identify vendors that attracted abnormal payment disputes. It was established to ferret out culprits participating in merchant fraud, allow genuine vendors to handle their chargebacks, safeguard cardholders, and preserve the Visa brand.

Aside from Visa, banks also used the VDMP to pick out vendors who exceeded established chargeback thresholds and guide them in sorting things out. VDMP also served for fraud control evaluations and operations reviews.

Mastercard operates a comparable but distinct initiative, the Mastercard GMAP, which focuses on merchant risk audits rather than chargeback ratio enforcement.

Nevertheless, entering the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program was bad news for any merchant, and it was wise to do everything possible to avoid it. That risk now lives under VAMP.

What is the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program?

Visa Dispute Monitoring Program was an aspect of Visa’s fiduciary responsibility to its stakeholders, whereby it tracked merchants that got excessive chargebacks and disputes.

When a vendor went beyond its established monthly chargeback threshold, Visa moved the vendor into the VDMP program.

The results were excessive processing fees, operating cutbacks, and expensive periodic reviews.

Entering into the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program meant that Visa saw a merchant’s recent transaction activity as risky, contingent on how many chargebacks it received in the previous month.

There were three levels of the VDMP. A merchant’s VDMP level was determined by the predetermined chargeback ratios and thresholds Visa used at the time:

1. VDMP Early Warning: 0.65% chargeback ratio and 75 chargebacks

A merchant in the early warning VDMP stage was not technically enrolled in the program. The early warning stage was Visa and the merchant’s bank’s way of signaling impending danger.

2. VDMP Standard: 0.9% chargeback ratio and 100 chargebacks

At this stage, Visa gave merchants a probationary period of four months to track down the causes of disputes and get the chargeback situation under control. Failure to achieve that objective meant Visa started an eight-month enforcement period.

3. VDMP Excessive: 1.8% chargeback ratio and 1,000 chargebacks

A merchant's MCC describes its business category; crossing a dispute threshold does not itself redefine that industry code. Legacy high-risk monitoring treatment and an assigned high-risk MCC are different concepts. An MCC code lookup shows which category a code covers. The excessive Visa dispute threshold and Excessive Chargeback Merchant program links provide related dispute-process context, not proof of an automatic MCC change.

Wat gebeurt er als ik me aanmeld bij het VDMP?

Entering the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program placed a significant burden on a merchant’s business. For starters, merchants attracted substantial fees and costs throughout the oversight period.

Visa placed a $50 fine on merchants in the VDMP Standard level for each dispute they received, beginning in the fourth month of the enforcement period.

Merchants with excessive chargeback rates spent 12 months in the program and were equally made to pay a $50 fine on each dispute filed against them, from the beginning of the enforcement period. Although these fees were placed on the acquirer, they were ultimately passed on to the merchant.

Aside from the fines, merchants also faced expensive review fees. Merchants in both the standard and excessive programs were made to pay a review fee of $25,000 near the close of the enforcement period.

Wat gebeurt er als ik mijn terugboekingspercentage niet onder de Visa-drempel krijg?

If a merchant entered the VDMP, Visa expected the merchant and its acquirer to work together in crafting a detailed chargeback mitigation plan that traced the sources of disputes and provided a commensurate action plan to address them.

Not creating an effective chargeback reduction strategy to meet the demands of exiting the VDMP within 12 months resulted in more sanctions. Visa could disqualify a merchant account, blocking it from processing any Visa card transactions, which could be fatal for a business that relied on Visa for the bulk of its volume.

Hoe kan ik me uitschrijven bij het VDMP?

In principle, Visa established the VDMP to encourage vendors to take chargeback mitigation seriously, not as a form of punishment for receiving chargebacks.

So if you’re wondering, could a merchant exit the VDMP? The answer was yes.

But that only happened if a merchant succeeded in lowering its chargeback rate below the monthly threshold and kept it there for three months in a row. If a merchant achieved that for two months and then crossed the threshold again in the third month, the clock reset to zero.

For a business already in deep water, the recommended path was (and still is) to track the root causes of chargebacks and establish dispute mitigation procedures to:

• Selecteer geldige transacties en verminder het aantal valse positieven.
• Beperk ongeoorloofde transacties.
• Pak de oorzaken van vermijdbare terugboekingen, zoals fouten van de handelaar, bij de wortel aan.
• Fight illegitimate chargebacks.
• De relaties met de sector versterken.

Legacy VDMP exit and processing restrictions depended on the applicable program and acquirer notice. Do not assume an exit restored every processor restriction or that every case led to indefinite suspension after 12 months. Current VAMP criteria, report periods and consequences must be assessed separately with the acquirer.

Is VDMP the Same as VFMP? And How Can I Avoid Enrollment in VDMP?

The VDMP was much like the Visa Fraud Monitoring Program (VFMP), though the two differed in compliance standards and expectations for merchants. Visa consolidated the legacy programs into VAMP beginning April 1, 2025 in applicable markets; confirm the current regional and acquirer notice. We covered VFMP’s legacy mechanics extensively in this piece.

Today, the equivalent goal is avoiding enrollment in VAMP, which still requires practical, disciplined chargeback mitigation. The standard practice remains the same: avoid disputes of all kinds.

Ideally, you should create a tiered chargeback mitigation strategy to ensure you are not mitigating criminal fraud while chargebacks caused by merchant errors are slipping through the cracks. But, such a wide-ranging dispute mitigation spectrum requires accurate data and informed prevention tactics.

Daar Chargeflow om de hoek Chargeflow . Chargeflow is een 100% kant-en-klare oplossing voor het automatiseren van geschillenafhandeling, Chargeflow ontworpen om e-commercebedrijven een voorsprong te geven.

Door gebruik te maken van big data en een naadloze integratie met uw bedrijf kunnen wij het meest uitgebreide bewijsmateriaal ter wereld op het gebied van chargebacks samenstellen, volledig afgestemd op uw winkel, en dit namens u versturen.

Handling chargebacks and disputes can be overwhelming and complicated, and if not done professionally, the outcomes can significantly hurt a business' bottom line. If you need help detecting friendly fraud, lowering chargeback exposure, stopping disputes, or keeping your chargeback ratio below Visa's VAMP threshold, Chargeflow can help. Learn more about our software and start your free test right away.