Recover 4x more chargebacks and prevent up to 90% of incoming ones, powered by AI and a global network of 20,000 merchants.
Managing chargebacks across multiple payment processors means maintaining a shared case register while preserving each provider’s deadlines, evidence requirements, and resolution process. Centralization improves visibility; it does not make all dispute routes identical.
| Field | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Provider and account ID | Identifies the account responsible for the case. |
| Dispute and payment IDs | Connects updates without duplicating the case. |
| Case type and stage | Separates inquiries, wallet claims, and card disputes. |
| Deadline and source timestamp | Preserves the current action date and data freshness. |
| Owner and next action | Makes responsibility explicit. |
| Amount, currency, and settlement reference | Supports accurate financial reconciliation. |
Stripe’s response instructions describe its evidence workflow and final submission. PayPal’s dispute-and-claim guidance distinguishes customer resolution from an escalated claim. Follow the route shown in the case rather than applying a generic processor deadline.
Identify which system is authoritative for the current status. A store dashboard, payment provider, and internal report may update at different times. Record refresh failures and reconcile them before acting on stale information.
Store reusable order, delivery, agreement, cancellation, and refund records. Then map the relevant records to each case’s fields and requirements. Include the actual evidence in the accepted format instead of assuming reviewers will open your internal links.
Use evidence standardization and follow-up request handling to manage different stages.
Assign one owner to each case and define a backup. Check for existing refunds, pending disputes, and completed responses before taking another action. An automation should report failures and final submission status, not merely show that a job started.
Use support and payments handoffs and the workflow audit checklist to test these controls.
Separate currency amounts, pending outcomes, and case types. Keep provider-specific monitoring calculations visible alongside internal portfolio measures. See multi-account performance reporting.
You can explore Chargeflow’s verified Stripe and PayPal integrations for connected dispute operations.
One deadline should not be applied across all processors. Preserve the action date from each case and allow time for internal review.
Reuse relevant source records, but adapt the final response to the provider, allegation, stage, and accepted format.
Centralization does not guarantee submission. Track ownership, exceptions, final confirmation, and failed or stale updates.
Recover 4x more chargebacks and prevent up to 90% of incoming ones, powered by AI and a global network of 20,000 merchants.
Chargeflow collects data from dozens of third party signals, not just transaction data like Stripe Dispute does. This allows for much more coverage and much better win rates because the evidence submitted is much more comprehensive and compelling..
Chargeflow collects data like order info, customer messages, and payment details. It builds a full dispute case for you, so you don’t have to lift a finger.
Yes! Chargeflow works with many processors — not just Stripe. That means one tool for all your chargebacks, no matter how you process payments.
You only pay a percentage of the revenue we help you recover. No upfront fees, no subscriptions — just success-based pricing.
Yes. Chargeflow is SOC 2, GDPR, and ISO certified. We use top security standards to keep your data safe.
Have a question? We’re here to help. Just hit the chat button to initiate a conversation with support.