Recover 4x more chargebacks and prevent up to 90% of incoming ones, powered by AI and a global network of 20,000 merchants.
A bank asking for more evidence means your first submission fell short. You usually get one short window, often about 30 days, to reply, so send tighter, reason-specific proof instead of resending the same documents.
When a bank requests more evidence, respond fast and submit tighter, clearer proof that directly addresses the dispute reason. Do not resend the same documents. Banks escalate these cases because something was missing, unclear, or did not match their requirements.

A second evidence request means your first representment did not settle the dispute. Depending on the card network, this stage is called a second presentment, a pre-arbitration, or a follow-up evidence request. You typically have about 30 days to respond, and missing that window usually forfeits the case by default. Treat it as your final, best chance: answer the exact rejection reason and nothing else. For deeper context, see how issuers evaluate chargeback disputes and why chargeback evidence is rejected by issuers.
Stripe: Evidence requests often mean the first submission failed issuer checks. Focus on clarity and date matching.
PayPal: Banks may request buyer communication or refund confirmation specifically, see the PayPal integration.
Subscriptions: Renewal confirmation and cancellation policy visibility matter most.
What banks typically expect depends on the dispute type, but often includes:
• Clarified proof of delivery or service
• Archived product page or policy screenshots
• Customer communication logs
• Proof of customer acknowledgment
• A clear timeline tying all evidence together
Banks request more evidence when the first submission leaves room for doubt. If the story is incomplete or subjective, the issuer pushes the burden back to the merchant.
When banks ask for more evidence, fast, focused follow-ups backed by Chargeflow help merchants turn a shaky first submission into a bank-ready case and recover revenue that would otherwise be lost by default.
It means your first chargeback response did not fully answer the dispute reason. The issuer is giving you one more chance to submit clearer, reason-specific proof before deciding.
Response windows are short, typically about 30 days under card-network rules. If you miss the deadline, the dispute is usually lost by default.
No. Resending identical evidence almost always fails. Identify the specific gap the bank flagged and replace weak evidence with stronger, more relevant proof.
Pre-arbitration is a later dispute stage where the issuer challenges your representment. Responding with tight, targeted evidence can resolve it before it escalates to costly arbitration.
Yes. Chargeflow Automation assembles, formats, and submits follow-up evidence on time and aligned with issuer expectations, so second requests are handled correctly.
Recover 4x more chargebacks and prevent up to 90% of incoming ones, powered by AI and a global network of 20,000 merchants.
Chargeflow collects data from dozens of third party signals, not just transaction data like Stripe Dispute does. This allows for much more coverage and much better win rates because the evidence submitted is much more comprehensive and compelling..
Chargeflow collects data like order info, customer messages, and payment details. It builds a full dispute case for you, so you don’t have to lift a finger.
Yes! Chargeflow works with many processors — not just Stripe. That means one tool for all your chargebacks, no matter how you process payments.
You only pay a percentage of the revenue we help you recover. No upfront fees, no subscriptions — just success-based pricing.
Yes. Chargeflow is SOC 2, GDPR, and ISO certified. We use top security standards to keep your data safe.
Have a question? We’re here to help. Just hit the chat button to initiate a conversation with support.